<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan London &#187; Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dan-london.com/tag/publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dan-london.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Google AdWords Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/multiple-google-adwords-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/multiple-google-adwords-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google does not allow one company to have multiple listings on one search term. Even if the company is using two different accounts, with two different website URLs, if the offer is similar, then then accounts are in violation according to the policy. Having more than one listing in the search results can be huge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google does not allow one company to have multiple listings on one search term. Even if the company is using two different accounts, with two different website URLs, if the offer is similar, then then accounts are in violation according to the policy. Having more than one listing in the search results can be huge for a company and generate significant revenue by almost performing a roadblock (when one advertiser takes over multiple ad slots on a webpage). I reported and advertiser who was violating the rules and was told that the offerings were just <em>&#8220;different&#8221;</em> enough to not be a violation.<span id="more-455"></span></p>
<p>Here is an example:</p>
<p>Search Results:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing_1.jpg"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing_1-300x201.jpg" alt="" title="writing_1" width="300" height="201" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-456" /></a></p>
<p>BookSurge</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing2.jpg"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing2-300x233.jpg" alt="" title="writing2" width="300" height="233" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-457" /></a></p>
<p>CreateSpace</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing3.jpg"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing3-300x236.jpg" alt="" title="writing3" width="300" height="236" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-458" /></a></p>
<p>Notice that each site is offering the same free book as well as having an almost identical layout. The one site even states that the sites have aligned to offer services to authors.</p>
<p>The issue is not unique to these Amazon owned companies. Check out these <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdWords/thread?tid=45aab8faa76ed663&#038;hl=en">double serving complaints</a> on the Google AdWords support forum. Do large spenders get a pass on double serving? I&#8217;ve been in the publishing industry and have a pretty decent idea what the self-publishing arm of Amazon is spending per month. Is Google looking the other in order to not impact Amazon&#8217;s overall paid search budget?</p>
<p><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&#038;page=guidelines.cs&#038;answer=47164&#038;adtype=all">Here is the Google policy on double serving</a>. Notice the large bold text that says: <strong>Don&#8217;t Do It</strong></p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/multiple-google-adwords-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Create Your Own Book Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/open-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/open-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read quite a few blogs each day and many of them are run by just one person. A few of them write additional material and make it available via a PDF or ebook format for free. A few even get “book deals” and put out content that becomes available at Amazon.com (do I even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read quite a few blogs each day and many of them are run by just one person. A few of them write additional material and make it available via a PDF or ebook format for free.<span id="more-23"></span> A few even get <em>“book deals”</em> and put out content that becomes available at Amazon.com (do I even need the .com suffix anymore?).</p>
<p>Having worked at Lulu.com for almost 3 years, I find it shocking that so many bloggers have a great website and get tons of traffic, but then they think they need a book deal. I do not want to name names, but countless “<em>ego bloggers</em>” have written books and felt the need to sign deals with small imprints of publishers. They all talk about controlling their “<em>content</em>” and being in control of their websites and personal branding, but then feel the need to try for a book deal. These deals do not get the writers rich, nor much money.</p>
<p>If they used an <a href="http://www.lulu.com/">open publishing company</a> such as <a href="http://www.lulu.com/">Lulu.com</a>, they could have retained all the rights to their writing, set their own price, got distribution into stores and Amazon.com and, most importantly, made more money per sale. Why do they speak about controlling their personal content, yet go off and try to make money through a “<em>traditional</em>” publisher? Ego.</p>
<p>There is a stigma associated with self-publishing (or vanity publishing, or open publishing, or whatever you want to call it). Many people think that self-publishing means that you are not good enough to get a book deal so people give up control and <em>money</em> just to go through a traditional publisher.</p>
<p>Smart writers have gone with publishing their own books and made a significant amount of money. Because I work at Lulu.com, I see the numbers. I don’t make as much money as the top sellers do in just a year. If the <em>ego bloggers</em> put their <em>egos</em> aside, they could realize that they could make far more money using a site like Lulu.com than they could the way they are publishing now. Wil Wheaton is one of the most popular bloggers and he recently chose to publish through <a href="http://stores.lulu.com/wilwheaton">Lulu.com</a> and has sold quite a few books and he has plans to continue.</p>
<p>Many people say that self-published books are not as good as those put out by a traditional publisher. Really? Take a walk into your local Barnes &amp; Noble and be sure to take a look at the giant discount book section. This section is full of books that spent about 2 weeks on the regular shelves before being reduced 70% and placed in the discount section.</p>
<p>If you want control. If you want to make more money. Go with a company like <a href="http://www.lulu.com/">Lulu.com</a> and take control of your writing and actually make money. I did and made a pretty decent amount of money when I published my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/open-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
