<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan London &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dan-london.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dan-london.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Merchant Ratings in Google AdWords</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/merchant-ratings-in-google-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/merchant-ratings-in-google-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently noticed that Google is now adding merchant ratings to Google AdWords listings. The link within the ad leads directly to the Google products seller rating page. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently noticed that Google is now adding merchant ratings to Google AdWords listings. The link within the ad leads directly to the Google products seller rating page.</p>
<p>I have seen a few ads in the &#8220;premium slots&#8221; that have contained a ratings link as well. The ads with rating information stand out significantly. I have not seen one with the Google checkout icon and the rating link yet, but if those are in existence, the CTR of those ads could be huge. <span id="more-511"></span></p>
<p>One ad I found with a rating link was for a company that did not list any items within a shopping feed, so this could enable service companies, restaurants, etc. to have their rating links added to AdWords ads.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/merchantratings.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-512" title="merchan_tratings_adwords" src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/merchantratings-300x126.png" alt="" width="300" height="126" /></a></p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/06/introducing-seller-rating-extensions-on.html">Google AdWords Blog</a>, the ratings will show up if:</p>
<ul>
<li>You have 30 reviews or more</li>
<li>You average 4 stars or better</li>
</ul>
<p>With more and more information being placed on a search page (maps, product listings, social features, etc.) and AdWords ads becoming larger, the organic results keep being minimized. How long before Google gets rid of them on some searches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/merchant-ratings-in-google-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Google AdWords Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/multiple-google-adwords-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/multiple-google-adwords-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google does not allow one company to have multiple listings on one search term. Even if the company is using two different accounts, with two different website URLs, if the offer is similar, then then accounts are in violation according to the policy. Having more than one listing in the search results can be huge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google does not allow one company to have multiple listings on one search term. Even if the company is using two different accounts, with two different website URLs, if the offer is similar, then then accounts are in violation according to the policy. Having more than one listing in the search results can be huge for a company and generate significant revenue by almost performing a roadblock (when one advertiser takes over multiple ad slots on a webpage). I reported and advertiser who was violating the rules and was told that the offerings were just <em>&#8220;different&#8221;</em> enough to not be a violation.<span id="more-455"></span></p>
<p>Here is an example:</p>
<p>Search Results:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing_1.jpg"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing_1-300x201.jpg" alt="" title="writing_1" width="300" height="201" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-456" /></a></p>
<p>BookSurge</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing2.jpg"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing2-300x233.jpg" alt="" title="writing2" width="300" height="233" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-457" /></a></p>
<p>CreateSpace</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing3.jpg"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/writing3-300x236.jpg" alt="" title="writing3" width="300" height="236" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-458" /></a></p>
<p>Notice that each site is offering the same free book as well as having an almost identical layout. The one site even states that the sites have aligned to offer services to authors.</p>
<p>The issue is not unique to these Amazon owned companies. Check out these <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdWords/thread?tid=45aab8faa76ed663&#038;hl=en">double serving complaints</a> on the Google AdWords support forum. Do large spenders get a pass on double serving? I&#8217;ve been in the publishing industry and have a pretty decent idea what the self-publishing arm of Amazon is spending per month. Is Google looking the other in order to not impact Amazon&#8217;s overall paid search budget?</p>
<p><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=en&#038;page=guidelines.cs&#038;answer=47164&#038;adtype=all">Here is the Google policy on double serving</a>. Notice the large bold text that says: <strong>Don&#8217;t Do It</strong></p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/multiple-google-adwords-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rich Are Different Than You and Me</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/the-rich-are-different-than-you-and-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/the-rich-are-different-than-you-and-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently made a change to search results. Certain searches will now trigger a link above the organic results and below the paid search results with a list of brands. Clicking these links do not take you to the brand&#8217;s homepage, but to your search result with the brand added in. For example, a search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google recently made a change to search results. Certain searches will now trigger a link above the organic results and below the paid search results with a list of brands. Clicking these links do not take you to the brand&#8217;s homepage, but to your search result with the brand added in.<span id="more-398"></span> For example, a search for &#8220;used golf clubs&#8221; triggers the below result:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Golf.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-399" title="Used Golf Clubs" src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Golf-300x173.png" alt="" width="300" height="173" /></a></p>
<p>If a user then thinks, &#8220;oh, hey. I know PING.&#8221; and then clicks the PING brand in the area between the paid and search they will then see this result:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/golf2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-400" title="Used Golf Clubs" src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/golf2-300x198.png" alt="" width="300" height="198" /></a></p>
<p>Now the results change.</p>
<p>In other searches I conducted the brand that shows up nowhere on the unbranded search organically is now at the top of the list after adding the branded term via the Google brands link.</p>
<p>A few thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li>This will make bidding on Competitors names even more essential.</li>
<li>Longtail keywords will be increasingly more important than &#8220;head&#8221; words (great point by <a href="http://www.adaptmarketing.com/">Linking</a> Geek Brian Chappell).</li>
<li>Google is caving to big advertisers who are consistently getting beaten at SEO and PPC.</li>
<li>How does Google decide what brands to show?</li>
</ul>
<p>If I&#8217;m a smaller company with a product that is just as good, <em>or better</em>, why can&#8217;t I have the same opportunity to get exposure in that same slot? Is a Google engineer making the decision?</p>
<p>This all reminds me of this Great Gatsby quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>They are different from you and me. They possess and enjoy early, and it does something to them, makes them soft, where we are hard, cynical where we are trustful, in a way that, unless you were born rich, it is very difficult to understand.</p></blockquote>
<p>and this exchange as well:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Fitzgerald</em>: The rich are different than you and me.<br />
<em>Hemingway</em>: Yes, they have more money.</p></blockquote>
<p>I could be reaching there, but hey, I was an English major. My earlier point is still valid. Google knows where there money comes from: big brands with deep pockets.</p>
<p>A bit more on the <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-now-recommending-brands-for-searches-41002">branded results</a> subject from Barry over at Search Engine land</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/the-rich-are-different-than-you-and-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/search-engine-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/search-engine-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite a few search marketing changes have occurred in the past few months. Here is a short list of a few of the developments that I feel will have the most impact: Google Ad Innovations A couple of items really stand out with these changes/new features: Re-marketing &#8211; This is huge. Knowing now that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a few search marketing changes have occurred in the past few months. Here is a short list of a few of the developments that I feel will have the most impact:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.google.com/ads/innovations/index.html">Google Ad Innovations</a></strong></p>
<p>A couple of items really stand out with these changes/new features:</p>
<p><em>Re-marketing</em> &#8211; This is huge. Knowing now that I can target users who have been to my site and not signed up for a free <a href="http://www.ShareFile.com">file sharing</a> trial is a great feature. Many banner networks offer re-targeting, but having the ability to make quick changes via Google is much easier. <span id="more-367"></span></p>
<p><em>Video Ads</em> &#8211; The targeting within a certain video via keyword is also a great new feature. I&#8217;m not sure what kind of impact this will have, but being able to target videos on YouTube could enable marketers to put ads on competitor&#8217;s videos.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/stars-make-search-more-personal.html">Google Stars for Search</a></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve long believed that personalization makes search more relevant and fun. For nearly five years, we&#8217;ve been tailoring results with personalized search. Today we&#8217;re announcing a new feature in search that makes it easier for you to mark and rediscover your favorite web content — stars.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh boy, &#8220;<em>makes search more relevant and fun</em>&#8220;. I&#8217;m not sure if there is any SEO impact or not. If a SERP gets starred by multiple users, will that listing get a bump?</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/relevance-meets-real-time-web.html">Real-Time Search</a></strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a huge fan of real-time search results as I don&#8217;t want the latest result, just the &#8220;best&#8221; result. When I am looking for real-time results I either use a search column in TweetDeck or the search functionality at Twitter.com. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bing.com/toolbox/blogs/search/archive/2010/03/25/new-stuff-coming-from-bing-this-spring.aspx">Bing&#8217;s Search Updates</a></strong></p>
<p>Bing announced a number of changes at SES NYC including:</p>
<p><em>Quick Tabs</em> &#8211; These tabs are meant to help the user refine their search. Bing stated 42% of all search queries required additional searches.</p>
<p><em>News</em> &#8211; Real time searches not only give the latest results from the leading news sites, but also provide the most popular shared links from that publication.</p>
<p><em>Maps</em> &#8211; Bing added Foursquare integration into the mapping functionality.</p>
<p>The Google &#8220;Caffeine&#8221; updated that was supposed to be launched during the post-holiday season has still not been pushed live according to Matt Cutts. I&#8217;ve seen some significant adjustments in the SERPs that are close to what was on the Caffeine sandbox, but I&#8217;m not sure if that is due to the update actually being pushed live or just a coincidence. I&#8217;d love your thoughts in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/search-engine-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Meet-Up: My PPC Presentation</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/ppc-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/ppc-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently invited to speak at a local SEO meet up put on by Ashley Berman-Hale and Phil Buckley. I shared the stage with Media Two&#8216;s Michael Hubbard and we gave a basic overview of paid search and took questions. The event was held at Isaac Hunter&#8217;s Oak City Tavern (which I have heard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently invited to speak at a local <a href="http://www.meetup.com/RaleighSEO/">SEO meet up</a> put on by Ashley Berman-Hale and <a href="http://www.1918.com">Phil Buckley</a>. I shared the stage with <a href="http://www.mediatwo.net/">Media Two</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://twitter.com/mediatwo">Michael Hubbard</a> and we gave a basic overview of paid search and took questions. The event was held at <a href="http://huntersoakcity.com/">Isaac Hunter&#8217;s Oak City Tavern</a> (which I have heard was a former brothel).<span id="more-296"></span></p>
<p>My presentation:</p>
<div style="width:425px" id="__ss_3555010"><strong style="display:block;margin:12px 0 4px"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/danlondon/ppc-basic" title="PPC Basic">PPC Basic</a></strong><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=ppcbasic-100325145156-phpapp01&#038;rel=0&#038;stripped_title=ppc-basic" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=ppcbasic-100325145156-phpapp01&#038;rel=0&#038;stripped_title=ppc-basic" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<div style="padding:5px 0 12px">View more <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/danlondon">Dan London</a>.</div>
</div>
<p>Feel free to ask questions in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/ppc-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Personalized Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/google-personalized-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/google-personalized-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personalized search is not what you think it will be. Google recently rolled out some changes to how personalized search will work. Many people believe that if you log out from Google OR turn off web history and search that you will be given “clean” results. This isn’t the case. I’ve done quite a bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Personalized search is not what you think it will be. </strong></p>
<p>Google recently rolled out some changes to how personalized search will work.  Many people believe that if you log out from Google OR turn off web history and search that you will be given “clean” results. This isn’t the case. I’ve done quite a bit of research within <a href="http://www.sharefile.com">ShareFile</a> for terms that we have been targeting and found that when I search for them within the office that I rank high for each and when I search from home, I am ranked a bit lower.  <span id="more-283"></span></p>
<p>I have had numerous people do the same searches for me out of state and found that they each have different results. I have conducted the searches logged in and logged out, and even on different computers. I have had others within our office conduct the same searches and found that their results in the office often mimic mine, but differ outside of the office. The results even differ depending on the browser used.</p>
<p>While this does create a major headache when trying to check rankings for key terms I feel that the bigger issue is that when searching for general terms, I do not necessarily want to see the same site over and over. For example, I search for “hockey gloves” and click on a site. I go to the site and buy them. Now, the next time I need hockey gear, I will most likely search for the website name or just go directly to the website. If I do search for “hockey gloves” (or another similar term) again after visiting that site, it would be because the site did not give me what I needed or gave me bad service and I was looking for an alternative. I’d rather see a clean list of sites and not ones that I might have clicked on in the past. In my opinion, search engines are for discovery and comparison shopping while bookmarking sites are for repeat visits.</p>
<p>Just because you are logged out, does not mean that Google does not know who you are and where you have been. The influence of others in the same office and network is also something to watch closely. I’m not sure I like the idea of a <em>“hive mind”</em> within my search results.</p>
<p>For some data on personalized search visit <a href="http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Google-re-ranking-and-personalized-search-study.html">HuoMah Seo Blog</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo Via: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wheatfields/116810137/">Wheatfields</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2010/google-personalized-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO: Google&#8217;s Keyword Meta Tag Announcement</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/seo-google-keyword-meta-tag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/seo-google-keyword-meta-tag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts, the newly bald, Google employee (not sure of his actual title) recently announced that the Keywords meta tag is not used for optimization by Google. This, of course, sent the SEO world into a tizzy. Every SEO &#8220;guru&#8221; came out of the woodwork on Twitter to proclaim that they &#8220;knew this for years.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/" target="_blank">Matt Cutts</a>, the newly bald, Google employee (not sure of his actual title) recently announced that the <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" target="_blank">Keywords meta tag is not used for optimization</a> by Google. <span id="more-219"></span>This, of course, sent the SEO world into a tizzy. Every SEO &#8220;<em>guru</em>&#8221; came out of the woodwork on Twitter to proclaim that they &#8220;knew this for years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/meta_tags.png"><img src="http://www.dan-london.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/meta_tags.png" alt="Meta Tags" title="Meta Tags" width="637" height="189" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-229" /></a></p>
<p><strong>My stance:</strong> I still use it and will continue to use it. Why? <em>I&#8217;m not saying</em>.</p>
<p>Of course, people have asked me, &#8220;but Dan, now your competitors know what terms you are targeting.&#8221; My response has always been, &#8220;If they are looking at my meta tags in order to optimize their site they obviously lack the SEO skills to actually rank on those terms.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just keep making good content and having a well-structured website and you will rank. Hard work pays off. Trust me.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gyazickr/2929081902/" target="_blank">Google Japan vending machine</a> image courtesy of Gyazickr.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/seo-google-keyword-meta-tag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SMBF Recap Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/smbf-dan-london-ppc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/smbf-dan-london-ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I posted a recap of my Social Media Business Forum session last week and now am able to provide my presentation slides via SlideShare and the video of my entire presentation via Alter Imaging. #SMBF Paid Search &#38; Social Media View more presentations from Dan London. The video SEO for Social Media &#8211; Panel from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a recap of my Social Media Business Forum session last week and now am able to provide my presentation slides via SlideShare and the video of my entire presentation via Alter Imaging.<span id="more-263"></span></p>
<div style="width:425px;text-align:left" id="__ss_2445492"><a style="font:14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif;display:block;margin:12px 0 3px 0;text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/danlondon/smbf-paid-search-social-media" title="#SMBF Paid Search &amp; Social Media">#SMBF Paid Search &amp; Social Media</a><object style="margin:0px" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=danlondonsocialmedia-091107105630-phpapp01&#038;rel=0&#038;stripped_title=smbf-paid-search-social-media" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=danlondonsocialmedia-091107105630-phpapp01&#038;rel=0&#038;stripped_title=smbf-paid-search-social-media" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<div style="font-size:11px;font-family:tahoma,arial;height:26px;padding-top:2px;">View more <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/danlondon">Dan London</a>.</div>
</div>
<p>The video</p>
<p><object width="400" height="300"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7346091&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7346091&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="300"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/7346091">SEO for Social Media &#8211; Panel from #SMBF &#8220;Social Media: Search Engine Marketing&#8217;s Best Friend&#8221;</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/alterimaging">Alter Imaging, Inc.</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><em><br />
Special Thanks to <a href="http://www.alterimaging.com/" target="_blank">Charlotte Web Design</a> firm Alter Imaging for capturing the video of my session.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/smbf-dan-london-ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictability of Search Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-trends-prediction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-trends-prediction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The official Google Research blog has recently posted an interesting article, On the Predictability of Search Trends. The post talks about how Google uses historical data to predict the search volume of certain terms during a certain time period. As we see that many of the search trends are predictable, we are introducing today a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The official Google Research blog has recently posted an interesting article,  <a href="http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-predictability-of-search-trends.html">On the Predictability of Search Trends</a>.<span id="more-161"></span></p>
<p>The post talks about how Google uses historical data to predict the search volume of certain terms during a certain time period.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>As we see that many of the search trends are predictable, we are introducing today a new <a href="http://www.google.com/support/insights/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=150698">forecasting feature</a> in Insights for Search, along with a <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/new-features-and-languages-for-google.html">new version</a> of the product. The forecasting feature is applied to queries which are identified as predictable (see, for instance, <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=basketball&amp;geo=US&amp;cmpt=q">basketball</a> or the trends in the <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=47&amp;cmpt=q">Automotive</a> category) and then shown as an extrapolation of the historical trends and search patterns.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The post is a follow up to an earlier post from back in April of this year, <a href="http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2009/04/predicting-present-with-google-trends.html">Predicting the Present with Google Trends</a>. This post included the white paper of the same name that is a <strong>MUST READ</strong> for all search marketers.</p>
<p>The post from April has some interesting information in it as well. </p>
<blockquote><p>Google queries in a category like &#8220;Automotive/Vehicle Shopping&#8221; during the first few weeks of March may help predict what actual March automotive sales will be like when the official data is released halfway through April.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very interesting information and a great tool that I have been using since it has been launched.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends">Google Trends</a><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#">Google Insights for Search</a></p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dullhunk/3389581452/">Dullhunk</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-trends-prediction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why SEO Should Matter to Small Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/why-seo-should-matter-to-small-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/why-seo-should-matter-to-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is a long-term solution for any business. For many small businesses, offline and online advertising is an expensive and often daunting task. With a limited budget and limited staff to get everything done, small business need to choose their advertising tactics wisely. SEO is one of the smartest things a small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is a long-term solution for any business. For many small businesses, offline and online advertising is an expensive and often daunting task. <span id="more-59"></span>With a limited budget and limited staff to get everything done, small business need to choose their advertising tactics wisely.<br />
<strong><br />
SEO is one of the smartest things a small business can do. </strong></p>
<p>Here are five reasons why SEO needs to matter more for all small businesses looking to be more successful online.</p>
<p>1. It’s Free! One of the biggest benefits to SEO is that it is often toted as being a “free” form of advertising. Any small business manager realizes that the time and resources needed to implement SEO tactics costs money. However, the impact that SEO can have for an online small business is tremendous – and the results are long-term. SEO can give you long-term success that your business can enjoy for years to come.</p>
<p>2. Overall Improvement: Oftentimes, SEO will significantly improve a user’s experience on the website while simultaneously appealing to the search engine spiders. After all, the search engines reward those websites that have the most relevant content and the easiest way to search the website. SEO puts these “best practices” into place.<br />
3. Increased Trust with Customers: If your website shows up first on the search engine results pages, your customers are immediately more likely to trust the website. A lack of trust is one of the biggest hurdles for ecommerce and lead generation websites. However, if search engines like Google and Yahoo! trust your website, your future customers will trust in it as well.</p>
<p>4. Long-Term Success: SEO can take weeks to take hold. However, once the SEO tactics are fully in place and recognized by the search engines, your placement at the top of the search engine results pages will ensure higher traffic and sales for months.</p>
<p>5. Simplicity: Unlike a number of other online advertising efforts, SEO can be easier to implement. Through methods such as copywriting, link building and more, any small business can work to implement the SEO steps that will ensure future success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/why-seo-should-matter-to-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Trends and Paid Search</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-trends-and-paid-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-trends-and-paid-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a paid search marketer, I am always tweaking and always looking for a new avenue to push my campaigns. One new method I have found is using Google Trends. If you aren’t familiar with Google Trends, it is a list of the most searched terms on Google on the current day. The top terms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/danieljlondon">paid search marketer</a>, I am always tweaking and always looking for a new avenue to push my campaigns. One new method I have found is using <a href="http://trends.google.com/trends">Google Trends</a>. <span id="more-57"></span>If you aren’t familiar with Google Trends, it is a list of the most searched terms on Google on the current day. The <a href="http://trends.google.com/trends/hottrends">top terms</a> of the day are labeled Volcanic, On Fire and Spicy and are ranked from 1 to 100. Each term will have a daily time frame showing when during the day the most searches are occurring, a list of related terms, search results, any new articles and some have a list of where the terms are happening the most.</p>
<p>I have found that I can take advantage of a hot topic by checking the top 15 or so in the morning and seeing if any of the terms make sense for any products I am pushing. For example, A few weeks ago I found that the term “Susan B. Anthony” was Volcanic. I did a search through my product list and found that I had a number of books about <a href="http://www.lulu.com/content/1000959?cid=s_twitter_dl">Susan B. Anthony</a> available. I quickly created a campaign and was able to push a number of sales through a term that I wouldn’t normally have in my account (my specific industry is a bit different and does not really fit into the mold of having the long, long list of long-tail keywords).</p>
<p>I take a look at the campaign after a few hours and decide to kill it or keep it going. This is 180 degrees from my usual campaign management. I like to run for a week before I tweak, but in this case, I make a quick decision.</p>
<p>There are a few other great <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#">search trend tools</a> that I use and will be writing about in the next few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-trends-and-paid-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Voice Mobile App for the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-voice-mobile-app-for-the-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-voice-mobile-app-for-the-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dan-london.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Google Voice app for the iPhone was released, I really didn’t think I’d use it at all as it seemed like such a vanity app. I really didn’t see a use for it as I figured just doing a text search in the app would be just as easy. I was wrong. My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Google Voice app for the iPhone was released, I really didn’t think I’d use it at all as it seemed like such a <em>vanity</em> app. I really didn’t see a use for it as I figured just doing a text search in the app would be just as easy. <strong>I was wrong.</strong> My wife and I wanted to order some quick and easy take out and didn’t have the phone number of the restaurant at hand. She started to walk over to her computer to boot it up and do a search, but I told her I’d get the number by doing a Google app iPhone search.</p>
<p>As i clicked on the app, I remembered that I could do a voice search and figured I’d give it a shot. It asked to use my current location and all I had to do was speak the name of the restaurant and I was given <em>localized</em> the search results. It found the closest location to me and I just touched the phone number in the listing and the phone dialed. The process was so easy. Of course, after we ordered I kept playing with the app to see exactly how well it worked. The success rate was pretty high. I even did some non-localized searches and got the right results. The app is ideal for trying to get a phone number, but I still like searching within the iPhone map app to do searches for local stores or locations that I am driving to.</p>
<p><strong>The Google Voice Mobile App for the iPhone Features:</strong></p>
<p><em>Voice Search. Speak your queries without even pushing a single button.</em></p>
<p><em>Search with My Location. Search for business, weather, and movie information without specifying where you are.</em></p>
<p><em>Local search suggestions on a map. See nearby business suggestions on Google Maps — just tap the “near me” suggestions.</em></p>
<p><em>Instant access to search. Start a Google search with just one click.</em></p>
<p><em>Google Suggest. Get relevant search suggestions as you type, saving you keystrokes.</em></p>
<p><em>URL suggestions. Get to popular web sites quickly by tapping site web address suggestions.</em></p>
<p><em>Contact search. Quickly find contacts in your address book.</em></p>
<p><em>Search history. Get instant access to your previous searches.</em></p>
<p><em>Easy access to other Google products. Launch other Google products like Maps, Gmail and News from the Apps tab.<br />
</em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/mobile/apple/app.html">Here is the Google Voice Mobile App for the iPhone official page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dan-london.com/2009/google-voice-mobile-app-for-the-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
